Date post: 2017-10-06 07:39
In this Socratic perspective, evil behavior is the same thing as wrongdoing. When we speak of human evil, we will use it solely in association with harmful human behavior (including the harmful withholding of action). This is because it is only through harmful behavior that any measure of human evil (no matter what your concept of evil) is recognizable. Harmfulness is the only evaluative criterion used for assessing the evil, or the wrong, of behaviors. If a behavior is not harmful at all then there is no basis of defining the evil of that behavior. Any other theological meanings we carry for the term evil are irrelevant to evaluating the most essential truths of actual human behavior in daily life.
Compared to australopiths, H. habilis has a relatively and absolutely bigger brain (average cranial capacity [a measure of the volume of the braincase, used to estimate brain volume] is around 685 cubic centimeters), a more vertical forehead, and weaker brow ridges (the enlarged bony area over the eye sockets). Additionally, the face and jaws of H. habilis are smaller and less projecting than those of the australopiths and the cheek teeth (the teeth behind the canine molars and premolars) are narrower mesiodistally (front-to-back).
These assumptions have been challenged by the discovery in 7559 of two small pieces of bone airing striations made by stone. One bone was from an antelope sized animal and the other from a bovid the size of a modern cow. The bones were found at Dikika, Ethiopia within the securely dated Sidi Hakoma formation and given an age of million years. By process of elimination, trampling of the bones underfoot by animals, toothmarks or their having been tumbled in a stream were ruled out and the only explanation for the markings appears to be the use of stone to flesh from the bones and striking one of the bones to fracture it and extract the marrow.
The purpose of this site is to further the pro-life movement by encouraging all good, moral people to oppose the vile practice of abortion. Our goal is to not only strengthen the resolve of existing pro-lifers, but also to awaken undecided people's innate, pro-life inclinations. Choose life!
Australopithecus afarensis is the only hominin taxon known to be present in this area between four and three million years ago and these bone markings would seem to settle the argument as to who was the first user of stone tools.
To see a world in a grain of sand
And a heaven in a wild flower,
Hold infinity in the palm of your hand
And eternity in an hour.
- William Blake (Auguries of Innocence)
Our new site integrates all related tools and services into convenient categories. We hope you will agree that the new site navigation design, which replaces the traditional list hyperlinks to various tools and services with a "tabbed" format, will make accessing all of the site options much more intuitive and easier to use.
The acceptance of the smallest discourtesy or the normalization of the slightest disrespect is not just the first step on the road to human evil. It is the whole of the journey. For human evil must not be measured according to the amplitude of its destructive force. It must be understood according to the character of its nature. There is no difference in the character of discourtesy and genocide. The fundamental nature of both is to be an expression of ignorance and fear. The identity of discourtesy and genocide as being evil is the same, because the nature of their origin is the same. Eliminate even the smallest discourtesy and the larger and more destructive results of human evil are never brought into being.
When we live the examined life, it is not only a benefit to our individual living and liberty. When we are thoughtful on a daily basis about justice and human virtue, it benefits our society. When we are thoughtfully attentive to those who think differently, the value of reason touches the world. The extent to which citizens devote themselves to living the examined life is a measure of the strength of the nation. Ethics, which is our reasoning about morality, is at the heart of living the examined life. Increasing the practice and quality of ethical and other reasoning in the daily lives of citizens is the most powerful way of confronting a clear and present danger which threatens our way of life.
The end result is that the morally weak person really believes that some things are more important for them than others and acts accordingly. Either the priorities are true and cohere with knowledge to bring benefit to the moral actor or they are false and cohere with ignorance, showing themselves to be delusions of weakness. It does not matter if the wrongdoing is the result of pure ignorance or was a product of moral weakness, the failure to live better in accordance with knowledge is ultimately a form of ignorance.